AG-2026.05-113·gr-qc·cross-listed: math.APmath.DG
The spacetime Penrose inequality under a quasi final state hypothesis
Authors
- Ahmed Ellithy
Abstract
Penrose's original heuristic for his eponymous spacetime inequality -- a conjectured lower bound on the ADM mass in terms of the area of a horizon cross-section -- relies on the black hole final state conjecture. In this paper we isolate a substantially weaker but precise late-time condition, which we call the quasi final state hypothesis and prove the spacetime Penrose inequality under this hypothesis. More precisely, for an asymptotically flat globally hyperbolic spacetime with a black-hole-type apparent horizon tube ${H}_{app}$ satisfying the dominant energy condition and the quasi final state hypothesis, we show that every asymptotically flat initial data set whose boundary is a MOTS cross-section of ${H}_{app}$ satisfies the spacetime Penrose inequality. The quasi final state hypothesis requires only a late-time decay condition on the normal component of the shift and the ratio of timelike to spacelike mean curvature, together with convergence of the cross-sectional areas of ${H}_{app}$ to a finite limit. Our approach is new and formulated directly in spacetime. The main geometric object is what we call a \emph{tangentially maximal} hypersurface, carrying a foliation by spacelike spheres whose timelike mean curvature vanishes. We show that these hypersurfaces are governed by a quasilinear inward-parabolic PDE, and we develop the corresponding a priori theory and prove global existence. On these hypersurfaces, the spacetime Hawking mass reduces to the Riemannian Hawking mass, and the dominant energy condition gives nonnegative scalar curvature. The Riemannian Penrose inequality, combined with the area laws for dynamical and isolated horizons, then yields the result.
Submitted
18 May 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.18730
Summary
Physicists prove a weakened version of Penrose's famous conjecture about black hole mass and horizon area by replacing the strong assumption that black holes eventually stabilize with a milder late-time decay condition.
- The quasi final state hypothesis—requiring only that horizon cross-sections stop changing and certain geometric quantities decay—is far weaker than assuming black holes reach a final equilibrium state, yet still sufficient to prove the inequality.
- The proof uses a novel spacetime approach based on 'tangentially maximal hypersurfaces' governed by geometric equations (parabolic PDEs), letting the authors reduce the problem to simpler Riemannian geometry where known results apply.
- This work bridges quantum gravity intuition (Penrose's original heuristic) with rigorous mathematical general relativity, potentially opening new routes to attack the full conjecture without needing the contentious final-state assumption.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.