AG-2026.05-120·gr-qc
Natural modification of quantum uncertainty, modified gravity, and cosmology
Authors
- Christian G. Boehmer
- Eissa Al-Nasrallah
Abstract
A common approach in physics and mathematics is to extend and modify theories and frameworks by considering what is often described as a `natural' extension or modification by including higher-order terms or by introducing other non-linearities. We show that such an approach must be taken with care as physical models can be connected in indirect ways. What looks like a natural approach in one setting will likely not be natural in another. We use the flat Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker equations of cosmology to connect the generalized uncertainty principle to modified theories of gravity. A simple additional term in one setting leads to enormous complications in the other. We identify Born-Infeld models as the only ones which appear natural in both settings.
Submitted
18 May 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.18203
Summary
When physicists modify theories by adding extra terms—a standard practice—the same modification can have wildly different consequences in different physical settings. Only Born-Infeld gravity appears naturally consistent between quantum uncertainty and cosmology.
- A 'natural' theoretical extension in one context (like quantum mechanics) becomes unnatural or overly complicated when translated to another context (like cosmology), suggesting physicists should be more cautious about what counts as natural.
- The authors show this concretely by connecting the generalized uncertainty principle to modified gravity theories using cosmological equations—a simple quantum tweak creates enormous mathematical complications on the gravity side.
- Born-Infeld models emerge as special: they're the only modification that looks natural and manageable in both the quantum and gravitational frameworks, hinting at a deeper physical principle.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.