AG-2026.05-122·astro-ph.CO·cross-listed: gr-qc
Gravitational lensing time delay beyond the Shapiro/geometry split
Authors
- Luca Teodori
- Kfir Blum
- Zhaoyu Bai
Abstract
Time delays are a key observable in strong gravitational lensing systems. Their theoretical expression is usually written as a sum of a geometrical delay and a Shapiro delay, with cosmology entering through angular diameter distances and a redshift prefactor. In this work we derive this structure from the exact null geodesics of the Schwarzschild-de Sitter metric. The standard formula is recovered as the leading term in a small-angle expansion, and we identify the first correction to the usual geometrical-plus-Shapiro split. Such correction does not introduce any new cosmological dependence: it corresponds instead to a higher-order correction intrinsic to the Schwarzschild part of the metric. As a consequence, up to this order, the cosmological constant enters only through the unlensed angular diameter distances and the unlensed lens-redshift prefactor.
Submitted
18 May 20263 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.18182
Summary
By deriving time delays from exact Einstein equations rather than approximations, researchers find that the standard formula for gravitational lensing delays holds to high precision, with corrections coming only from the lensing mass itself, not the universe's expansion.
- The familiar split of time delays into geometric and Shapiro components emerges naturally from solving Einstein's equations exactly, validating decades of observational practice.
- First-order corrections to this formula depend only on the lensing mass's spacetime curvature, not on cosmological parameters like dark energy, simplifying how we extract universe measurements from lensed light.
- This result clarifies which observations are truly sensitive to cosmology versus which are controlled by local gravity, improving our ability to use gravitational lenses as precision cosmological tools.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.