AG-2026.05-136·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.HEhep-ph
Impact of the axion-like self-interactions in gravitational atoms for LISA
Authors
- Samuel Gómez Gómez
- Xisco Jimenez Forteza
- Carlos Palenzuela Luque
Abstract
Ultralight bosons with self-interactions, such as axion-like particles, can form astrophysical Bose-Einstein condensates around stars or compact objects, often referred to as gravitational atoms. In this work, we adopt a recently proposed dynamical formation mechanism for these halos and estimate their impact on extreme- and intermediate-mass-ratio inspirals when present around the primary black hole. We show that, for signal-to-noise ratios $\lesssim 100$, LISA can distinguish gravitational waveforms from binaries embedded in such halo overdensities. Our analysis indicates that LISA can probe boson masses $m_\mathrm{dm}\sim10^{-17}$-$10^{-15}\,\mathrm{eV}$ and decay constants $f_a\sim10^{10}$-$3.2 \times 10^{12}\,\mathrm{GeV}$ using binaries with total masses $M\sim10^4$-$10^5\,M_\odot$, assuming conservative DM densities consistent with the central values of Navarro-Frenk-White profiles. Allowing for higher background densities and different extreme-mass-ratio configurations further extends the accessible parameter space. Moreover, we find that for a binary configuration with $M\sim10^4\,M_\odot$, $ρ_\mathrm{dm} = 10^3\,\mathrm{GeV/cm^3}$, and signal-to-noise ratio $\mathrm{SNR}\sim20$, a particle mass of $m_\mathrm{dm}\sim2.5\times10^{-16}\,\mathrm{eV}$ and decay constant $f_a\sim6.3\times10^{10}\,\mathrm{GeV}$ maximize the dephasing due to dynamical friction, enabling the recovery of the particle parameters at the percent level. These results demonstrate that LISA can place constraints on axion-like particle masses and self-interactions without requiring additional couplings to Standard Model fields.
Submitted
17 May 20263 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.17589
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.