AG-2026.05-137·hep-th·cross-listed: gr-qcmath-ph
Semi-classical Imprint of Horizon Induced Instability
Authors
- Arnab Chakraborty
- Onirban Islam
- Arshad Momen
Abstract
We consider an inverted harmonic oscillator in the space $L^{2} (\mathbb{S})$ of square-integrable functions on the circle $\mathbb{S}$ and compute its density of states employing the stationary phase approximation. Our computation is based on an oscillatory integral representation of the Schwartz kernel of the time-evolution operator. This demonstrates thermalisation as a semi-classical manifestation of the classical Lyapunov instability -- reported earlier in [Phys. Rev. D 102, 044006; Phys. Rev. D 102, 124047] using heuristic analytic continuation. Our spectral analysis of the Hamiltonian points out and closes the conceptual and mathematical gaps in the preceding literature.
Submitted
17 May 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.17586
Summary
Using rigorous semi-classical mathematics, the authors show that an unstable quantum system (inverted harmonic oscillator) exhibits thermalization—apparent heat-like behavior—as a quantum reflection of classical chaos, filling gaps in earlier heuristic work.
- The paper provides a mathematically rigorous derivation of thermalization in unstable quantum systems using the stationary phase approximation, replacing earlier hand-wavy analytic continuation arguments.
- It demonstrates a concrete semi-classical link between classical Lyapunov instability (sensitivity to initial conditions in chaotic systems) and quantum thermalization (loss of coherence and apparent equilibration).
- The spectral analysis resolves conceptual ambiguities in prior work, showing how instability at the classical level leaves measurable fingerprints in quantum density of states.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.