AG-2026.05-162·nucl-th·cross-listed: astro-ph.HE
Astrophysics equation of state inference with Bayesian chiral effective field theory uncertainties
Authors
- Melissa Mendes
- Hannah Göttling
- Anna Hensel
- Isak Svensson
- Kai Hebeler
- Achim Schwenk
- Nathan Rutherford
- Anna Watts
Abstract
We investigate Bayesian chiral effective field theory ($χ$EFT) uncertainties, which assign a statistical interpretation to equation of state (EOS) distributions near nuclear saturation density, n$_0$, as well as constraints from perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD) to Bayesian EOS inference from LIGO/Virgo, NICER and pulsar mass observations. The tails of the $χ$EFT uncertainties allow for broader pressure ranges in our priors, but large parts of these are excluded by the astrophysical observations, so that the EOS and the resulting mass-radius posteriors are still very consistent with our earlier work. Within our broad prior ranges, we observe a clear stiffening of the EOS at $n \gtrsim 3 n_0$. Moreover, the impact of the pQCD constraints on the posterior EOS and mass-radius range is negligible due to the astrophysics constraints. Exploiting the strong correlation between pure neutron matter and matter in beta equilibrium, we infer the symmetry energy slope parameter $L$ from astrophysics. For the $68\%$ credible interval, we obtain $L=42.6-52$ MeV and $L=44.2-56.7$ MeV using piecewise-polytrope and speed-of-sound high-density extensions, respectively. The $L$ posterior is mainly driven by the combination of GW170817 LIGO/Virgo and PSR J0740+6620, PSR J0437-4715, and PSR J0614-3329 NICER observations.
Submitted
18 May 20262 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.18560
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.