AG-2026.05-178·hep-th·cross-listed: gr-qc
Approaching the surface of an Exotic Compact Object
Authors
- Shokoufe Faraji
- Samir D. Mathur
Abstract
Many approaches to quantum gravity require replacing the traditional black hole geometry with an Exotic Compact Object (ECO), which has a large but not infinite redshift at its surface. We argue that near the ECO surface, the vacuum Einstein equations imply a metric that is chaotic, with increasingly large oscillations as we approach the surface. This behavior is analogous to the `cosmic billiards' found in the BKL analysis of cosmology near the big bang. For the ECO, some of the potential walls of this billiards change sign to become `cliffs', resulting in a runaway behavior where some compact directions squeeze to zero size. In string theory such squeezing yields a natural continuation to the interior geometry of fuzzballs, where compact directions collapse to create monopoles.
Submitted
19 May 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.20013
Summary
Near the surface of proposed quantum-gravity alternatives to black holes, spacetime becomes chaotic with wild oscillations; this behavior naturally connects to string-theory fuzzball geometries where extra dimensions collapse.
- Exotic compact objects (quantum gravity replacements for black holes) exhibit chaotic, increasingly violent metric oscillations as you approach their surface—similar to dynamics near the Big Bang.
- Some directions of space behave like they're being squeezed toward zero size near the surface, creating a 'runaway' instability that differs from classical black hole geometry.
- This chaotic behavior provides a bridge to fuzzballs in string theory, suggesting quantum gravity may naturally resolve black hole singularities through dimensional collapse.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.