AG-2026.05-207·gr-qc·cross-listed: hep-th
Vacuum, ma non troppo: hidden matter distribution in symmetry-transformed electrovacuum spacetimes
Authors
- Carlos A. R. Herdeiro
- João P. A. Novo
Abstract
We analyse two static spacetimes, recently generated from a Schwarzschild--Bertotti--Robinson electrovacuum seed through distinct symmetry transformations. The electromagnetic field of the transformed solutions can be set to zero and both solutions were presented as vacuum solutions of General Relativity. However, we show that once recast in Weyl form, both metrics are seen to be supported by a semi-infinite annular mass distribution on the equatorial plane. Thus, these metrics harbour a hidden matter source, visible in Weyl coordinates. In the original Schwarzschild-like coordinates equatorial null geodesics reach spatial infinity ($r\to\infty$) in finite affine parameter. In the Weyl representation, these geodesics approach the inner edge of the annulus, where the coordinate map degenerates.
Submitted
18 May 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.18967
Summary
Two spacetimes thought to be empty vacuum solutions actually contain hidden matter—an invisible ring of mass on the equatorial plane—revealed only when expressed in different mathematical coordinates.
- Symmetry transformations can conceal matter sources: these metrics look empty in one coordinate system but contain a ring-shaped mass distribution when rewritten in Weyl coordinates.
- The same physical spacetime can appear radically different depending on coordinate choice—geodesics that seem to escape to infinity actually terminate at the matter ring's edge.
- This suggests that classifying solutions as 'vacuum' or 'matter-filled' isn't coordinate-independent; what matters is understanding the full geometric structure beneath coordinate disguises.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.