AG-2026.05-215·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.CO
Cosmological perturbations of TDiff fields
Authors
- Antonio L. Maroto
- Prado Martín-Moruno
- Diego Tessainer
Abstract
We study scalar field theories that break diffeomorphism invariance down to the subgroup of transverse diffeomorphisms through the matter sector in cosmological backgrounds. We focus on single- and multi-field models and develop the corresponding cosmological perturbation theory. We analyze the different contributions to the pressure perturbation, discussing the adiabaticity and the effects in the perturbation coefficients of the interactions that arise in the multi-field case as a consequence of the symmetry breaking. We also consider the stability of the perturbations in terms of the effective speed of sound and present particular models that could be of phenomenological interest.
Submitted
18 May 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.18424
Summary
Researchers study how scalar quantum fields can break a fundamental symmetry of general relativity (diffeomorphism invariance) in expanding universes, developing the mathematical tools to predict how density fluctuations evolve in such theories.
- The authors formalize cosmological perturbation theory for fields that preserve only a restricted symmetry (transverse diffeomorphisms), which requires new calculations for how pressure and density fluctuations behave.
- In multi-field models, the symmetry breaking creates new interaction terms between fields that alter the effective speed at which density waves propagate—a key observable signature.
- The framework identifies which models remain physically stable (avoiding runaway fluctuations) and highlights specific scenarios that could be tested against observations of the early universe.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.