AG-2026.05-225·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.HEhep-ph
Dimming of Photon Ring due to Photon-Axion Conversion around Kerr Black Holes
Authors
- Rahul Dhyani
- Sauvik Sen
- Indrani Banerjee
- Ashmita Chakraborty
- Arindam Chatterjee
Abstract
We investigate photon-axion conversion in the vicinity of rotating Kerr black holes where strong gravity traps photons on near-circular trajectories, effectively enhancing the path length. We explore the observable signatures of such a conversion near the photon region. The process, driven by ambient magnetic fields, is significantly more efficient around supermassive black holes such as M87*, since the luminosity of photons increases with the mass of the BH. By numerically evaluating photon path lengths (on which the conversion depends), we analyze how key parameters-photon frequency, axion mass, photon-axion coupling, magnetic field strength, plasma density, and black hole spin-affect the conversion probability and the resultant dimming of photon spectral luminosity. We find that the conversion is most efficient at high frequencies (X-rays and gamma rays), while the frequency window associated with efficient conversion widens with an increase in the photon-axion coupling and a decrease in the electron density and the axion mass. The magnitude of dimming of the photon spectral luminosity depends primarily on the magnetic field, the photon-axion coupling and the BH spin. Our study reveals that rotating black holes generally exhibit enhanced dimming compared to static ones. Thus, if future telescopes achieving a resolution $\sim 10^{-5}$ arcsec in the X-ray/gamma-ray band detect a dimming of the photon spectral luminosity, then they can provide interesting constraints on the axion mass and its coupling with photons.
Submitted
21 May 20263 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.22696
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.