AG-2026.05-233·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.CO
Dark Energy in Ghost-free non-local Gravity
Authors
- S. D. Odintsov
- V. K. Oikonomou
- G. S. Sharov
Abstract
Ghost-free non-local gravity is investigated with regards to its late-time dynamics. Viable solutions in this model are confronted with the observational data including the Pantheon+ catalogue of Type Ia supernovae, the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and the Hubble parameter estimations $H(z)$. The ghost-free non-local gravity is found to be successful in these tests in comparison to the $Λ$CDM model and can be also comparable with the generalized exponential $F(R)$ gravity scenario. However the model encounters difficulties when the data from the above observations and the cosmic microwave background radiation data are combined. In tests with the whole set of Pantheon+, DESI, $H(z)$ and CMB data, the generalized exponential $F(R)$ model is essentially more successful. This success is related with the dynamical behavior of its effective dark energy equation of state evolving from a phantom to a quintessence phase during the late-time epoch, whereas the ghost-free non-local model demonstrates only a quintessence behavior. Hence the ghost-free non-local gravity scenario is successful only when the Pantheon+, DESI and $H(z)$ data are considered. The generalized exponential $F(R)$ model satisfies the viability conditions and in tests with all observational data including CMB surpasses the $Λ$CDM model in $χ^2$ statistics and also with information criteria.
Submitted
21 May 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.22348
Summary
Ghost-free non-local gravity explains late-time cosmic expansion using observational data, but struggles when combined with cosmic microwave background measurements, while a related modified-gravity model performs better overall.
- Ghost-free non-local gravity fits supernova, galaxy, and expansion-rate data well and rivals the standard ΛCDM model, suggesting gravity itself might explain dark energy rather than invoking unknown matter.
- The model fails when CMB data are included, indicating tension between fitting the young and old universe—a key test that alternative gravity theories must pass.
- A generalized exponential F(R) variant succeeds where non-local gravity doesn't because its dark-energy properties shift dynamically over cosmic time, whereas non-local gravity remains static.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.