AG-2026.05-236·physics.hist-ph·cross-listed: gr-qc
The Limitations of the Notion of `Observable' in Diffeomorphism-Invariant Models
Authors
- Álvaro Mozota Frauca
Abstract
The application of the notion of `observable' from gauge theory to diffeomorphism-invariant theories -- most relevantly to general relativity -- has led to numerous conceptual and technical issues when interpreting classical theories with this symmetry and building quantum versions of them. In this article I distinguish between two senses of gauge transformation: local and global, and I argue that the notion of observable appears more naturally in the local sense of gauge transformation. Then, I argue that diffeomorphism invariance can be understood as a gauge symmetry only from a global point of view, and hence, that the concept of observable applies only in a restricted manner. This has the consequence that some popular claims in the literature, such as the claim that the physical content of diffeomorphism-invariant models is encoded in correlations, are unfounded.
Submitted
21 May 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.22260
Summary
The paper argues that treating diffeomorphism invariance (the symmetry underlying general relativity) like a gauge symmetry leads to conceptual errors, because these symmetries work differently than the local gauge symmetries of particle physics.
- Gauge symmetries come in two flavors—local (like in electromagnetism) and global (like overall rotations)—and 'observables' naturally fit the local case, not the global one.
- Diffeomorphism invariance in general relativity functions as a global rather than local gauge symmetry, meaning the observable concept doesn't straightforwardly apply to spacetime geometry.
- Popular claims that all physical content in general relativity reduces to correlations between events are not well-founded once you properly account for what observables can and cannot be in this context.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.