AG-2026.05-239·astro-ph.CO·cross-listed: gr-qchep-ph
Dark photon -- Assisted Primordial Magnetogenesis
Authors
- Debottam NandiVIT Chennai
- Debajyoti ChoudhuryUniversity of Delhi
Abstract
Magnetic fields observed across cosmic scales are difficult to explain within conventional physics. A primordial origin is, thus, often assumed. While a nonminimal coupling of the inflaton with the electromagnetic field could theoretically generate magnetic fields of about $10^{-13}$ G, this approach faces significant issues, including strong-coupling and backreaction problems. ``Dark photons", arising naturally in hidden-sector extensions of the Standard Model, provide a well-motivated framework for addressing various cosmic as well as particle physics issues. We demonstrate that coupling dark photons with standard ones can result in adequate magnetogenesis without the limitations of existing models. This minimal mechanism may also provide insights into unresolved cosmic mysteries.
Submitted
21 May 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2605.22174
Summary
Dark photons—hypothetical particles from hidden sectors of physics—can generate the cosmic magnetic fields we observe without the technical problems that plague existing explanations.
- Standard inflation-based magnetogenesis models suffer from mathematical instabilities (strong coupling and backreaction); this paper shows dark photons avoid those pitfalls.
- Dark photons naturally couple to ordinary photons, creating a new pathway to seed the universe's magnetic fields during inflation without requiring exotic inflaton properties.
- This mechanism is minimal and well-motivated by beyond-Standard-Model physics, potentially solving both the magnetogenesis puzzle and other open questions in cosmology simultaneously.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.