AG-2026.06-018·physics.flu-dyn·cross-listed: physics.ao-ph
Breaking-induced energy dissipation of surface gravity waves at varying scales and co-flowing wind stresses
Authors
- Rui Cao
- Enrique M. PadillaUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya
- Xu ChenOcean University of China
- Adrian H. CallaghanImperial College London
Abstract
Breaking-induced energy dissipation is studied for individual unsteady breaking waves using laboratory measurements of unidirectional surface gravity wave groups across a range of wave scales and wind stresses. A refined framework to estimate breaking-induced dissipation $ΔE_{br}$ is proposed that accounts for background dissipation from non-breaking processes. Using this framework, we show that variations in wave scale primarily influence breaking energetics, such as fractional dissipation $ΔE_{br}/E_0$ and dissipation rate $ε_b$, by modifying the breaking onset threshold. Also, co-flowing wind systematically reduces both $ΔE_{br}/E_0$ and $ε_b$ relative to unforced conditions, as wind-forced waves break earlier with reduced crest forward-leaning. Exploiting the crest-front steepness at incipient breaking $\mathcal{S}_{\text{front}}(t_b)$ to characterise breaking onset and local crest geometry, we formulate a scaling for $ε_b$ based on this local measure. This then yields $ΔE_{br}/E_0 \propto β^{*}\,\mathcal{S}_b\,(τ_b/T_b)$, where $β^{*}$ is crest forward leaning, $\mathcal{S}_b$ local steepness, and $τ_b/T_b$ non-dimensional breaking duration. This scaling highlights the important roles of crest asymmetry and breaking duration in setting the breaking energy dissipation. Finally, we consider the breaking strength parameter $b$ by assessing existing steepness-based scaling laws, and relate $b$ to $\mathcal{S}_{\text{front}}(t_b)$, yielding an approximately linear dependence once the breaking-onset threshold is considered.
Submitted
1 June 20265 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.01705
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.