AG-2026.06-070·cond-mat.dis-nn·cross-listed: quant-phstat.ML
Nonreversible Gauge Fields in Fokker--Planck Dynamics: Supersymmetric Hamiltonians and Learned Finite Forces
Authors
- Masayuki Ohzeki
Abstract
We formulate stationary-density-preserving nonreversible perturbations of Fokker--Planck dynamics as gauge fields that deform relaxation spectra while leaving the invariant state fixed. When detailed balance holds, a similarity transformation maps the reversible Fokker--Planck operator to a Witten-Laplacian-type supersymmetric Hamiltonian; nonreversible gauges then appear as non-Hermitian perturbations that preserve the zero mode but modify the excited spectrum. This operator viewpoint gives a common language for relaxation gaps, circulating probability currents, hypocoercive acceleration, and finite control costs. We represent admissible gauge currents by antisymmetric tensor fields and identify the detailed-balance-violating Ohzeki--Ichiki force as a constant symplectic example whose infinite-strength limit is Hamiltonian dynamics. The continuous-time spectral gap alone does not select a finite gauge strength, so we introduce a finite-time regularized objective and an actor--critic procedure for learning the gauge. An exactly solvable anisotropic Gaussian Ornstein--Uhlenbeck benchmark separates the spectral transition from the finite-time optimum and shows that the learned gauge recovers the Lyapunov-equation optimum. A double-well benchmark then illustrates the same constrained selection in a nonconvex metastable landscape. Stochastic gradient methods enter this framework as physically relevant Fokker--Planck systems: mini-batch noise acts as an effective diffusion tensor, and adaptive methods such as Adam correspond to metric choices with possible nonequilibrium currents.
Submitted
4 June 20261 week ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.06412
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.