AG-2026.06-1274·cond-mat.supr-con·cross-listed: cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.opticsquant-ph
Cavity-enhanced superconducting response in an underdoped cuprate
Authors
- Angela Montanaro
- Vadim Plastovets
- Nitesh Khatiwada
- Jacopo Fiore
- Giacomo Jarc
- Abdullah Alabbadi
- Antonio Mastropasqua
- Enrico Maria Rigoni
- Shahla Y. Mathengattil
- Simone Dal Zilio
- Francesca Fassioli Olsen
- Fabio Novelli
- Stephan Winnerl
- Michael A. Sentef
- Dante M. Kennes
- Andrew J. Millis
- Francesco Piazza
- Daniele Fausti
Abstract
Superconductors carry electrical current without resistance when paired electrons condense into a coherent macroscopic quantum state. In underdoped cuprates, evidence suggests that pairing-related correlations and superconducting fluctuations can survive above the temperature at which global coherence is lost, pointing to phase fluctuations as a key limitation on superconductivity in this regime. Motivated by recent demonstrations of cavity-modified collective states in quantum materials, we investigate whether superconducting coherence can be stabilized by engineering the electromagnetic environment of the superconductor. We study an underdoped YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-δ}$ thin film in a tunable terahertz cavity formed with a semi-transparent gold mirror. From temperature-dependent terahertz transmission measurements, we find that the cavity enhances the superconducting response below the critical temperature, with an increase of the inferred superfluid weight. The effect becomes more pronounced at smaller cavity lengths and is accompanied by an upward shift of the superconducting onset temperature. Calculations based on a cavity-coupled model for phase-fluctuating superconductors capture these trends and support an interpretation in terms of cavity-enhanced phase stiffness. These results showcase the potential of cavity engineering for designing emergent functionalities in correlated systems.
Submitted
16 June 2026today
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.18084
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.