AG-2026.06-1323·gr-qc
Impact of the Einstein Telescope's duty cycle on the estimation of binary black holes parameters
Authors
- Luca Negri
- Thomas C. K. Ng
- Thibeau Wouters
- Tim J. Kuhlbusch
- Harsh Narola
- Robin Chan
- Kailib Ryan Doney
- Francesco Cireddu
- Isaac C. F. Wong
- Fabian Gittins
- Peter T. H. Pang
- Anuradha Samajdar
- Achim Stahl
- Justin Janquart
- Chris Van Den Broeck
- Tjonnie G. F. Li
Abstract
The geometry of the Einstein Telescope, the proposed next-generation European gravitational-wave observatory, is yet to be finalized. Two competing designs are under consideration: a nested triangular configuration (ET-Δ) and two separated L-shaped detectors (ET-2L). Extensive prior comparisons of ET designs established the scientific landscape using the Fisher-information-matrix formalism and identified that duty-cycle-induced single-detector operation is precisely the regime where this approximation becomes less reliable, underscoring the need for a refined, principled treatment of the duty cycle. In this manuscript, we build on that foundation by revisiting the comparison with full Bayesian parameter estimation of gravitational-wave signals from binary black-hole mergers, projected onto a simulated Einstein Telescope that incorporates a refined duty cycle modelled via continuous-time Markov chains and testing different detector maintenance strategies. We find that the redundancy inherent in the ET-Δ design enables it to maintain at least two operational detectors for the majority of the observing time, whereas the ET-2L configuration is often limited to a single detector. Crucially, we show that, during partial network operation, ET-Δ often outperforms ET-2L, and that the increased multi-detector uptime translates into tighter constraints on the luminosity distance and source-frame component masses. Notably, this remains true even when gravitational-wave events have a lower signal-to-noise ratio in ET-Δ than in ET-2L.
Submitted
17 June 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.19201
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.