AG-2026.06-1378·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-ex
Semi-leptonic decays $B \to D^{(*)}(1S,2S)\ell ν_{\ell}$ within the covariant light-front approach
Authors
- Zhi-Jie Sun
- Zhi-Qing Zhang
- Shi-Chen Xue
- Feng-Zhou Wang
Abstract
We present a systematic analysis of the semi-leptonic decays $B_{(s)}\to D_{(s)}(1S,2S)\ellν_\ell$ and $B_{(s)}\to D^*_{(s)}(1S,2S)\ellν_\ell$ with $\ell=e,μ,τ$ within the covariant light-front quark model (CLFQM). Using the form factors of the transitions $B_{(s)}\to D_{(s)}(1S,2S)$ and $B_{(s)}\to D^*_{(s)}(1S,2S)$, we calculate the branching ratios of the relevant semi-leptonic decays and find that $Br(B_{(s)}\to D_{(s)}\ell^\primeν_{\ell^\prime})$ and $Br(B_{(s)}\to D^*_{(s)}\ell^\primeν_{\ell^\prime})$ with $\ell^\prime=e,μ$ are agree well with the data, while $Br(B_{(s)}\to D_{(s)}τν_τ)$ and $Br(B_{(s)}\to D^*_{(s)}τν_τ)$ are systematically smaller than the experimental measurements. This naturally gives rise to the so-called $\mathcal{R}(D)$ and $\mathcal{R}(D^*)$ anomalies. Our predictions $\mathcal{R}(D)=0.261\pm0.013$ and $\mathcal{R}(D^*)=0.228\pm0.026$ show $3.1σ$ and $2.1σ$ deviations from the current experimental world averages compiled by the Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV), respectively, yet only deviate by $0.16σ$ and $1.5σ$ from the latest LHCb measurements. For the decays $B_{(s)}\to D_{(s)}(2S)\ellν_\ell$ and $B_{(s)}\to D^*_{(s)}(2S)\ellν_\ell$, their branching ratios lie in the range $10^{-4}\sim10^{-3}$, which are much larger than the results from the Bethe Salpeter (BS) equation , but agree with the relativistic quark model (RQM) calculations. Furthermore, we also calculate the forward-backward asymmetries $\mathcal{A}_{FB}$ and longitudinal polarization fractions $f_L$ for the corresponding decays. Our predictions are consistent with most other theoretical results and experimental data
Submitted
17 June 2026yesterday
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.18576
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.