AG-2026.06-1451·astro-ph.CO
Onsite Calibration of the Shear-Shear Correlation
Authors
- Cong Liu
- Jun Zhang
- Zhenjie Liu
Abstract
Calibration of the cosmic shear bias is crucial for justifying the cosmological results. However, it is still unclear to what extent calibrations based on simulated galaxy images, as what is commonly done in the weak lensing community, can capture the real shear bias, especially given the complicated instrumental effects. On the other hand, selections of the source galaxies (magnitude cut, redshift binning, etc.) made in real measurement, as well as stochastic but possibly correlated shear biases, may introduce errors to the shear-shear correlations that are hard to calibrate apriori. In our previous few papers, we have shown that the field-distortion signal associated with each galaxy image can be saved in the shear catalog to provide onsite calibrations of shear bias for both galaxy-galaxy lensing and shear-shear correlation. In this paper, we apply this method to the HSCpdr3 shear catalog generated by the Fourier\_Quad shear measurement method. Using our onsite calibration method, we find that the shear biases vary with the selections of photo-z bins, SNR cuts, optical bands, as well as alternative forms of the shear estimators. Nevertheless, after calibrations, the shear-shear correlation functions and cosmological parameter constraints show consistent results in all the cases considered. The fiducial results from the r/i/z bands shear catalog with $\mathrm{SNR}>10$ cut yield: $S_8=0.740^{+0.030}_{-0.030}$ and $Ω_m=0.383^{+0.129}_{-0.132}$
Submitted
17 June 2026yesterday
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.18705
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.