AG-2026.06-1780·gr-qc
Extended parameterized spin expansion formalism for ringdown analysis with GW250114
Authors
- Jia-Ning Chen
- Liang-Bi Wu
- Zong-Kuan Guo
Abstract
We extend the Parameterized Spin Expansion Coefficients (ParSpec) framework for ringdown tests of black holes by simultaneously sampling the characteristic length scale $\ell$ and the scaling index $p$, where the two parameters are replaced by $\tilde{p}$ and $\tilde{\ell}$ in subsequent analysis, respectively. Unlike previous analyses that fix $\tilde{p}$ to theory-motivated integer values, this extension provides a theory-agnostic description inspired by effective-field theory to the Kerr ringdown spectrum. Using \texttt{pyRing}, we apply the framework to GW250114 with informative priors on $M_{\rm f}$ and $D_{\rm L}$, comparing the $220$-only and $220+221$ mode models under different conditions on $γ$. The posterior distributions of $\tilde{\ell}, \tilde{p}$ and $γ$ are presented with different ringdown start times. We show that the posterior of $\tilde{p}$ remains largely prior dominated, indicating that current ringdown data cannot distinguish different scaling behaviors of the correction. The inferred constraint on $\tilde{\ell}$ is instead mainly controlled by the geometry of the allowed parameter space induced by the $γ$ condition. In particular, $γ<1$ provides the most natural prescription in the $(\tilde{\ell},\tilde{p})$ plane and yields stable but weak upper bounds of $\tilde{\ell}_{90}\simeq 83\, {\rm km}$. An analysis based on the Kullback-Leibler divergence further shows that, after accounting for the effective prior associated with $γ<1$, the data-driven information gain on $\tilde{\ell}$ and $\logγ$ is very small. At the current SNR level, the $220$-only model provides a more informative constraint than the $220+221$ model. We also perform a joint analysis including GW231123 and find that the combined constraint is dominated by GW250114.
Submitted
21 June 20262 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.22580
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.