AG-2026.06-1862·hep-th
Lost in Translation: Moduli Stabilization from EFT to Eleven Dimensions
Authors
- Iosif Bena
- Raphaël Dulac
- Mariana Graña
- Dimitrios Toulikas
Abstract
We explicitly show how moduli stabilization is realized geometrically in M-theory compactified on $T^4/\mathbb{Z}_2\, \times\, $K3, by using the Gibbons-Hawking approximation of the K3 metric. By relating this compactification to certain microstate geometries, we present the explicit solutions in which fully backreacted fluxes on certain four-cycles stabilize three of the $T^4/\mathbb{Z}_2$ compactification moduli. The minimal tadpole contribution of these fluxes is linear in the number of stabilized moduli, and we argue that this linear relation holds for more general fluxes. We also construct a one-parameter family of supersymmetric eleven-dimensional solutions that break Lorentz invariance and the warped-product structure of the compactification. These solutions are a continuous deformation of the warped-product Lorentz-invariant compactification, to which they reduce when the moduli reach their stabilized values. Away from the Lorentz-invariant locus, the fluxes are no longer self-dual in the internal space, and include fields that do not exist in the corresponding EFT. Remarkably, although these fluxes still stabilize a modulus, it is not the $T^4/\mathbb{Z}_2$ modulus that appears stabilized in the Lorentz-invariant solution, but rather a nontrivial combination of the $T^4$ volume and K3 shape moduli. The existence of these solutions suggests that the EFT description of moduli stabilization can be misleading and does not reflect the moduli-stabilization dynamics of the full eleven-dimensional theory. Our results extend straightforwardly to Type IIB String Theory compactified on orientifolds of $T^2 \times K3$.
Submitted
23 June 20262 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.25016
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.