AG-2026.06-1935·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.HE
A geometric multimessenger consistency test of radiative and near-zone gravity with LISA and SKA
Authors
- Bhooshan Gadre
Abstract
Compact binary pulsars observed both through precision radio timing and low-frequency gravitational waves offer a direct way to compare the same binary geometry with two independent messengers. We propose a multimessenger consistency test based on the orbital inclination, measured from the Shapiro-delay shape parameter in radio timing and from the tensor polarization amplitude ratio in the gravitational-wave signal. Defining the common-epoch residual $\eps(t_0)=s_{\rm Shapiro}(t_0)-s_{\rm GW}(t_0)$, general relativity predicts $\eps=0$, while a nonzero value would indicate either an unmodeled systematic or a mismatch between the near-zone and radiative descriptions of gravity. We estimate the attainable precision on this quantity for representative LISA--SKA compact binary pulsars using a seven-parameter timing Fisher matrix and a sky-averaged LISA sensitivity curve including the Galactic foreground. We adopt a conservative radio baseline, $σ_{\rm TOA}=1\,μ{\rm s}$ and $N_{\rm eff}=10^4$, intended to summarize radiometer noise, jitter, residual dispersion-measure and scattering effects, profile evolution, and cadence losses after wideband timing. For systems at $d=5\,{\rm kpc}$ observed for four years, we find $σ_\eps\simeq4\times10^{-3}$ for a favorable double neutron star and $σ_\eps\simeq9\times10^{-4}$ for a hypothetical pulsar--black-hole system. The former is the more robust astrophysical benchmark; the latter illustrates the reach if such a high-SNR chirping source is discovered. The useful cases remain limited mainly by gravitational-wave polarimetry, while radio timing supplies the near-zone reference measurement of the inclination. These results define a quantitative target for future joint Bayesian analyses of compact binary pulsars observed in both radio and gravitational waves.
Submitted
25 June 20264 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.26945
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.