AG-2026.06-2136·astro-ph.HE
Broad-band Spectral Modeling of Large-Scale X-ray Jets in High-Redshift Quasars: An MHD-Informed Approach
Authors
- Patryk Liniewicz
- Łukasz Stawarz
- C. C. Cheung
- Giulia Migliori
- Aneta Siemiginowska
Abstract
We present a systematic spectral analysis of kiloparsec-scale jets in high-redshift quasars, modeling their radio-to-X-ray emission as synchrotron radiation and inverse-comptonization of CMB by relativistic electrons. In contrast to the homogeneous one-zone approximation commonly adopted in the literature, we describe the jet as a current-carrying, axially symmetric outflow with a purely toroidal magnetic field in magnetohydrostatic equilibrium and with radial velocity shear. In this framework, the pressure, magnetic-field, and bulk-velocity profiles are linked self-consistently, capturing the radial stratification of the emitting region without introducing additional free parameters. For any individual source, the model effectively retains only a small number of free parameters, including the total jet power, $L_{\rm j}$, and the on-axis bulk Lorentz factor, $Γ_0$. We consider two prescriptions for the radial distribution of the radiating electrons -- proportional either to the gas pressure or to the rest-frame magnetic energy density -- and two toroidal-field profiles, yielding four model variants. Applying the model to a sample of ten quasar jets at $z \geq 2.5$ with X-ray features resolved by \textit{Chandra}, we perform Bayesian parameter inference and model comparison. The Bayesian evidence systematically favors electron distributions that follow the gas pressure rather than the magnetic energy density, while the data discriminate only weakly between the assumed field profiles. The inferred jet powers, reaching $L_{\rm j} \sim 10^{49}\,\mathrm{erg\,s^{-1}}$, are systematically larger than those obtained from one-zone models, and the corresponding global jet magnetization parameters are low. None of the derived quantities, including $Γ_0 \sim \mathcal{O}(10)$, shows a significant monotonic trend with redshift.
Submitted
25 June 20264 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.26961
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.