AG-2026.06-2155·astro-ph.HE·cross-listed: astro-ph.SR
Two years of shock interaction tracing three phases of evolution: the explosion of a Type IIn supernova, SN 2019vxm
Authors
- Gitika Rameshan
- Rishabh Singh Teja
- D. K. Sahu
- G. C. Anupama
- Masayuki Yamanaka
- Keiichi Maeda
- Tatsuya Nakaoka
- Sota Goto
- Brajesh Kumar
- Avinash Singh
- Miho Kawabata
- Koji S. Kawabata
- Kenta Taguchi
Abstract
We present multi-wavelength photometric and optical spectroscopic observations of the long-lived interacting supernova SN 2019vxm, spanning more than two years after the explosion. SN 2019vxm is a slowly rising (rise time ~ 45.9 days in the R-band), slowly declining supernova reaching an R-band peak absolute magnitude of ~-20.3 mag. The SN light curve post-maximum shows a shallow decline, followed by a secondary, steeper decline in the optical (0.01 mag/day), with late-time IR brightening. The total radiated luminosity is 5x10^50 erg, placing it among the energetic class of its type. We estimated a CSM mass of 3-8 M_sun through light-curve modeling (independent of the CSM density profile) and by comparison with theoretical models. We estimate a minimum ejecta mass of ~ 3.88 M_sun from the broad H-alpha component, consistent with the ejecta mass obtained from the light curve models. The solely interaction-dominated initial epochs are later accompanied by photon-scattering signatures, leading to asymmetric line profiles with symmetric wings. The late phase, characterized by enhanced brightness at longer wavelengths and a stronger asymmetric line profile with the red side flux strongly suppressed, indicates the influence of pre-existing or newly formed dust with temperatures ~ 1500 K at ~4x10^16 cm. Even in the late phases, no nebular lines are present in the spectra, indicating dense or obscured ejecta.
Submitted
24 June 20265 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.25896
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.