Loading…
AG-2026.06-2194·astro-ph.GA
Authors
Abstract
Star formation emerges from the complex interplay between gravity, turbulence, magnetic fields, and stellar feedback, all of which vary across spatial scales and Galactic environments. Over the past decades, extensive multiwavelength surveys of the Galactic Plane have progressively unveiled this complexity. Far-infrared and sub-millimetre surveys have identified and characterized tens of thousands of star-forming regions, revealing their mass, temperature, and evolutionary stage. Complementary molecular-line surveys, spanning several CO transitions and isotopologues, have mapped the gas kinematics from giant molecular clouds down to sub-parsec structures. The advent of interferometers such as ALMA has revolutionized this field, enabling systematic studies of gas dynamics, fragmentation, and collapse in dense clumps at scales of a few thousand astronomical units. At the same time, mid-infrared and radio surveys at frequencies 0.8 <= nu <= 5 GHz have traced ionised gas associated with the earliest and latest phases of massive-star evolution, including thermal radio jets, hypercompact and ultracompact HII regions, supernova remnants, planetary nebulae, and evolved massive stars. Yet, a uniform, Galaxy-wide census of ionised structures and feedback processes remains elusive. A transformational leap forward requires a sensitive, high-resolution radio survey of the Galactic Plane at 10-15 GHz, capable of resolving physical scales smaller than 0.05 pc at distances up to 20 kpc. This is precisely the goal of the SKA-Mid Galactic Plane survey, which will, with its unprecedented sensitivity, angular resolution, and mapping speed, provide the first panoptic view of ionised gas and stellar feedback across the Milky Way.
Submitted
24 June 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.26278
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.