AG-2026.06-2203·astro-ph.GA
Cosmic evolution of the helium and oxygen abundances in type 2 Active Galactic Nuclei: Helium-loud AGNs
Authors
- O. L. Dors
- M. Armah
- G. F. Hägele
- M. V. Cardaci
- P. C. Santos
- R. A. Riffel
- G. Cresci
- R. Riffel
- L. N. Marinho
- X. Ji
- Y. Isobe
- R. Maiolino
- A. Marconi
- A. Feltre
- R. L. Sanders
- I. N. Morais
- G. C. Almeida
Abstract
We derive the helium and oxygen abundances in the Narrow Line Regions (NLRs) of 84 Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) spanning two redshift ranges: 65 objects at $z \: < \: 0.2$ and 19 objects at $2.8 \lesssim z \lesssim 6.8$. Spectroscopic data in the optical rest-frame range [3000 $λ(\textÅ)$ 7000] from the JADES survey and from the literature were used to estimate $\text{He/H}$ and $\text{O/H}$ via the $T_{\rm e}$-method (7 objects) and strong-emission line calibrations (19 objects). Our results indicate that the ionization degree in AGNs increases toward higher redshifts, exhibiting a trend similar to that observed in star-forming galaxies. We find that the majority of our sample of AGNs at $z \: > \: 2.8$ show oversolar helium abundances and subsolar oxygen abundances. We identified, via the $T_{\rm e}$-method, an object (goods-s-mediumhst-58850; $z=6.2615$) with the highest helium abundance estimated to date, i.e. $12+\log({\rm He/H})=11.64$, corresponding to $\rm (He/He_{\odot}) \sim 4.4$. This result remains robust even when we adopt larger electron densities (varying $N_{\rm e}$ from $500$ to $10\:000$ $\rm cm^{-3}$) in abundance estimates using the $T_{\rm e}$-method and empirical strong-line methods. We found marginal evidence for a decline in the He/H abundance ($\sim 0.04$ dex per redshift unit) toward lower redshifts. In contrast, we found evidence for an increase in $\text{O/H}$ toward the local universe at a rate of approximately 0.06 dex per redshift unit.
Submitted
24 June 20265 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.25890
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.