AG-2026.06-282·cond-mat.mes-hall·cross-listed: quant-ph
Frequency-resolved decoherence spectroscopy of a semiconductor charge qubit coupled to a high-impedance resonator
Authors
- Ekaterina Al-Tavil
- Wonjin Jang
- David J. van Woerkom
- Ville Maisi
- Stefano Bosco
- Jan A. Krzywda
- Jeroen Danon
- Christian Reichl
- Werner Wegscheider
- Thomas Ihn
- Klaus Ensslin
- Andreas Wallraff
- Pasquale Scarlino
Abstract
Superconducting resonators coupled to semiconductor quantum dots provide a powerful platform to investigate light-matter interaction and decoherence mechanisms in solid-state quantum systems. Here we study a hybrid circuit quantum electrodynamics architecture consisting of a GaAs double-quantum-dot charge qubit capacitively coupled to a high-impedance, frequency-tunable SQUID-array resonator. By tuning the qubit transition frequency over the range $ω_\mathrm{q}/2π\sim 3$-$6$ GHz, we perform frequency-resolved decoherence spectroscopy of the charge qubit across a broad energy window. Time-resolved measurements enable us to disentangle relaxation and pure dephasing processes and to identify distinct decoherence regimes as a function of qubit frequency. We find that at lower frequencies ($\leq 4.5$ GHz) dephasing dominates the qubit linewidth, whereas at higher frequencies energy relaxation becomes the leading contribution. The measured frequency dependence of the relaxation rate exhibits a cubic scaling, consistent with charge-qubit decay dominated by coupling to a piezoelectric phonon bath and providing frequency-resolved access to the corresponding phonon-induced spectral density. Our results show that hybrid semiconductor--superconducting circuits can serve as sensitive spectroscopic tools to probe microscopic decoherence mechanisms relevant for a wide range of hybrid quantum devices.
Submitted
8 June 20263 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.09722
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.