AG-2026.06-351·astro-ph.HE
Disk reflection as the origin of the X-ray polarization of NGC 4151 with IXPE
Authors
- E. Kammoun
- M. Dovčiak
- J. Podgorný
- I. E. Papadakis
- V. Binas-Valavanis
- S. Bianchi
- V. E. Gianolli
- F. Ursini
- J. A. García
Abstract
We present an X-ray spectro-polarimetric study of the nearby type-1 active galactic nucleus NGC 4151 using two long IXPE observations obtained in 2022 and 2024, supported by simultaneous XMM-Newton and NuSTAR spectroscopy. IXPE measures a polarization degree of $\sim 6-7\%$ above 4 keV, with a polarization angle parallel to the radio jet, and a distinct low-energy component with a different angle, indicating at least two polarized components in the $2-8$ keV band. Previous work interpreted the hard X-ray polarization as evidence for a radially extended slab-like corona. Here we test an alternative scenario in which the observed polarization is produced predominantly by relativistic reflection from an accretion disk illuminated by a compact, lamp-post-like corona. Using recently developed models, we fit the IXPE Stokes spectra with a lamp-post plus distant-torus geometry, including partial-covering absorption and an additional soft polarized power-law component. We find that the data require a low coronal height ($h<9\,R_{\rm g}$ at $3σ$) and a relatively large torus opening angle ($>45^\circ$ at 3$σ$), while the disk reflection contributes $\sim 20\%$ of the 2-8 keV flux. The soft polarized component carries only $\sim 1-5\%$ of the flux but has a high polarization degree ($>10\%$) and a polarization angle around $20^\circ$. The same configuration provides acceptable fits to the $0.4-79$ keV XMM-Newton and NuSTAR spectra, demonstrating that disk reprocessing by a compact corona can simultaneously account for both the polarization and broadband spectral properties of NGC 4151.
Submitted
7 June 20263 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.08862
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.