AG-2026.06-353·astro-ph.HE
On The Nature of Einstein Probe Transient EP250916a: Insights from X-ray, Optical, and Radio Observations
Authors
- Gaurava K. Jaisawal
- Giulia Illiano
- Francesco Carotenuto
- Astrid L. Bouquin
- David M. Russell
- Giorgos Leloudas
- Andrea Sanna
- Dalya Akl
- Rob Fender
- Sara Motta
Abstract
We report multi-wavelength studies of the transient EP250916a, detected by the Einstein Probe on 2025 September 16. Located at low Galactic latitude, the source exhibited a rapid X-ray brightening, reaching an unabsorbed 0.5--10 keV flux of $(6.4 \pm 0.1) \times 10^{-10}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, followed by a plateau and a two-stage decay lasting over 40 days. Swift/XRT monitoring shows a persistently hard spectrum ($Γ\approx 1.6$--2.2) with only modest softening during decay, while a NuSTAR observation confirms a hard-state continuum extending up to 70 keV. Timing analysis of XMM-Newton data reveals a weak quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) at $\sim$13 Hz. No other coherent pulsations or thermonuclear bursts are detected. Broadband spectral modeling favors a nonthermal power-law continuum with partial-covering absorption, and shows no significant thermal disk component. Optical imaging obtained with NOT/ALFOSC, LCO, and GaiaDR3 identifies two faint sources within the 2 arcsec Swift/XRT positional uncertainty. A MeerKAT observation at 1.28 GHz yielded no radio counterpart, with a 3$σ$ upper limit of 60 $μ$Jy beam$^{-1}$. The combination of a long-lasting outburst, a hard nonthermal X-ray spectrum, a weak QPO detection, the absence of coherent timing features, and faint potential optical counterparts disfavors a stellar-flare or extragalactic origin and supports an accreting compact-object scenario. Comparisons with similar faint, hard-state transients place EP250916a within a growing population of low-luminosity, hard-state black hole X-ray binary candidates.
Submitted
7 June 20264 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.08752
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.