AG-2026.06-476·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-thmath-ph
The Scattering Algebra of Physical Space: Wigner-Covariance and Fields
Authors
- Moab Croft
- Neil Christensen
Abstract
Following previous work, the Algebra of Physical Space (APS) is used to explore Wigner-covariance and spin/helicity fields within the Constructive Standard Model (CSM) of Particle Physics. The spinor formalism of the APS is used to derive explicit Wigner-covariance of Lorentz spinors, and equivalencies with the CSM are demonstrated via the Scattering Algebra (SA). Constructive fields for spin-1/2 and spin-1 are given in the APS and the necessary maps for Wigner-covariance are proposed. The forms of these spin fields are equivalent to Pauli spinors, thereby serving as a new bridge between the CSM and the study of Quantum Information. It is further seen that spin-1/2 fields of the APS are equivalent to the spin-1/2 fields in the CSM, but the massless cases cannot yet be handled within the SA due to various complications. Similarly, while spin-1 fields exist inside the APS, their SA equivalents deviate from the originally proposed spin-1 fields of the CSM; so further work is needed to prove correspondence between spin-1 fields of the APS and the CSM. Sample Lagrangian densities of the CSM are analyzed using the methods herein, are given geometric interpretations, and are connected to traditional Pauli Theory. Finally, the hff (Higgs and two massive fermions) Lagrangian density is used to determine the first constructive scattering amplitude that is defined purely in terms of the APS. Concerningly, this leads to an anti-Hermitian action term, and this surprise is later confirmed using traditional CSM techniques. Throughout this paper, the illuminating power of Geometric Algebra is clear: Everything has a geometric interpretation, and results can be accomplished matrix-free as well as coordinate-free.
Submitted
8 June 20263 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.10082
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.