AG-2026.06-576·astro-ph.CO
Synergy between the gravitational potential decay rate and other structure growth probes in testing gravity
Authors
- Shang Li
- Pengjie Zhang
- Fuyu Dong
Abstract
We test gravity by exploiting the synergy between the gravitational potential decay rate ($\mathit{DR}$) and complementary structure-growth probes: these observables respond to MG parameters with different degeneracy directions, so their combination yields stronger constraints than any single probe. We adopt the tomographic $\mathit{DR}$ measurements reported in \citep{2025ApJ...982...99D} and combine them with CMB-lensing-tomography $Σ_8$ constraints and $fσ_8$ measurements from DESI DR1 full-shape analyses and the DESI peculiar-velocity field. We apply this joint data vector to two representative frameworks: phenomenological parameterizations and the Effective Field Theory (EFT) $α$-basis. For the phenomenological form $P_{\rm MG}(a)=1+P_{{\rm MG},0}\,Ω_{\rm DE}(a)/Ω_{\rm DE}(0)$, where $P_{\rm MG}$ denotes $μ$, $η$, or $Σ$, we obtain $μ_0=0.09\pm0.35$ and $Σ_0=0.01\pm0.06$. Compared to the measurements combination $Σ_8+fσ_8$, including $\mathit{DR}$ tightens the constraint on $Σ_0$ by a factor of $\sim2$. For the $(μ_0,η_0)$ case we find $μ_0=0.06^{+0.17}_{-0.23}$ and $η_0=-0.03^{+0.36}_{-0.46}$; relative to $Σ_8+fσ_8$, adding $\mathit{DR}$ improves the constraints on both parameters by a factor of $\sim1.5$. In the EFT $α$-basis, adopting the parameterization $α_i(a)=c_i\,Ω_{\rm DE}(a)$ with $i\in\{{\rm M,B}\}$, we find $c_{\rm M}=0.64^{+0.32}_{-0.72}$ and $c{\rm B}=0.31^{+0.19}_{-0.29}$. The corresponding EFT uncertainties are about a factor of $\sim2$ smaller than those reported in \citep{2025JCAP...09..053I}, which combined DESI full-shape and BAO measurements with DES-SN5YR and CMB data. These results demonstrate the capability of $\mathit{DR}$ and the necessity of including the $\mathit{DR}$ measurements in testing gravity.
Submitted
9 June 20262 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.10597
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.