AG-2026.06-589·astro-ph.HE
Resolving SLX 1744-299 and SLX 1744-300 in the hard X-ray band: implications for their ultracompact nature
Authors
- Enzo A. Saavedra
- Montserrat Armas Padilla
- Teo Muñoz-Darias
Abstract
Persistent, low-luminosity low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) offer a unique opportunity to study accretion in this poorly understood regime, as well as to unveil new members of the ultracompact X-ray binary (UCXB) family, characterised by orbital periods ($P_{\rm orb}$) shorter than $\sim 80$ min. We report on a NuSTAR archival observation that, for the first time above 10 keV, spatially resolves the Galactic Centre pair SLX 1744$-$299 and SLX 1744$-$300. We find SLX 1744$-$300 to be slightly brighter, with a flux ratio of $\sim 1.15$, increasing to $\sim 1.3$ when extrapolated to 0.5$-$10 keV. Both the timing (root-mean-square variability) and spectral properties (well described in both cases by a thermal Comptonisation model) indicate that the systems were in the hard state. The two sources, however, display markedly different behaviour throughout the observation. SLX 1744$-$299 shows a gradual flux decline consistent with a decrease in the mass-accretion rate, whereas SLX 1744$-$300 remains steady but exhibits two short-recurrence Type-I X-ray bursts indicative of mixed H/He burning. Combining our results with previously reported upper limits on the distance, we derive low persistent X-ray luminosities of $L_{\rm X}\lesssim 1.1\times10^{36}$ erg s$^{-1}$ and $L_{\rm X}\lesssim 2.6\times10^{36}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (3$-$78 keV) for SLX 1744$-$299 and SLX 1744$-$300, respectively. The corresponding mass-accretion rates, when compared with the critical values from the disc instability model, favour $P_{\rm orb}\lesssim 90$ min and $P_{\rm orb}\lesssim 105-155$ min. Although both limits are formally compatible with the UCXB regime, the case of SLX 1744$-$299 appears significantly more compelling, also considering the previously reported intermediate-duration burst.
Submitted
9 June 20262 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.11133
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.