Systematic comparison of VMEC and HINT equilibrium calculations for finite-beta LHD plasmas

Abstract

A systematic comparison between VMEC and HINT equilibrium calculations has been carried out for Large Helical Device plasmas to clarify the influence of the assumption of the nested flux surfaces at finite beta.Three vacuum magnetic-axis configurations, $R_{\rm axV} = \SI{3.53}{\, m}$, $\SI{3.60}{\, m}$, $\SI{3.85}{\, m}$, are examined for the beta values on the axis in the range $β_0 \in [0.0\%, 5.0\%]$. The magnetic-axis position, the rotational transform on the axis, and the plasma volume enclosed by the last closed flux surface are compared between the two codes. At low-$β_0$, VMEC and HINT give consistent equilibria, indicating that the nested flux surfaces are largely preserved. Above a configuration-dependent critical $β_0$, however, the two solutions begin to diverge, indicating that the nested flux surfaces assumption is compromised. In HINT, the enclosed plasma volume decreases at higher beta because the stochastic magnetic field evolves near the plasma edge, whereas VMEC cannot represent this flux surface breaking due to its assumption of nested flux surfaces. These results show that the 3D equilibrium responses in LHD equilibria become increasingly important from inward- to outward-shifted configurations, mainly through Pfirsch-Schlüter current-driven perturbations of the magnetic field and the resulting edge stochasticity.