AG-2026.06-754·quant-ph·cross-listed: cs.CRcs.ETcs.IT
Superspace Concentration and Adversarial Robustness in Quantum Algorithms
Authors
- Eric Yocam
- Christian Yocam
- Varghese Vaidyan
- Yong Wang
- Mahesh Kalappattil
- Anthony Rizi
Abstract
We study superspace concentration as a quantum resource, formalized through the focus measure F(\r{ho}) = λ_max(\r{ho}_super) - the largest eigenvalue of the reduced superspace state - which quantifies the capacity of a quantum system to concentrate informational weight into a preferred subspace of an extended degree-of-freedom space. We develop a complete resource-theoretic framework around this measure and validate its properties through GPU-accelerated numerical simulation. Analytic decoherence predictions are confirmed to machine precision (1.11 x 10^{-16}) for superspace dimensions dS in {2,4,8,16,32}. Focus monotonicity holds across 10,000 random states with zero violations under four focus-non-generating channels across six system configurations. Focused quantum states resist coherent unitary attacks with significantly greater resilience than standard fidelity predicts, with focus remaining above 0.9 at attack strength ε = 0.302 versus ε = 0.174 for fidelity. We further demonstrate that the focus measure and the U(dS)-asymmetry measure are operationally distinct: asymmetry remains near zero and provides no robustness signal under coherent and targeted attacks while focus tracks spectral concentration and remains robust until ε > 0.3. The connection between Grover's algorithm and superspace concentration is made explicit via the identity F(|ψ_k><ψ_k|) = P(marked), providing a resource-theoretic interpretation of oracle query complexity. Finally, we provide the first numerical characterization of the focus capacity gap ΔF, identifying a log_2(dS) scaling law confirmed for both product and correlated noise channels.
Submitted
10 June 2026yesterday
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.11580
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.