AG-2026.06-860·physics.flu-dyn
Data-driven surrogate models for forecasting experimentally measured fluid flows
Authors
- Peter I. Renn
- Emily H. Palmer
- Cong Wang
- Morteza Gharib
Abstract
Data-driven modeling shows significant promise for faster-than-real-time forecasting of fluid flows. For real-world engineering applications (e.g., flow control), models must contend with limited, imperfect, and incomplete experimental measurements. In this work, we present an analysis of data-driven surrogate models trained to forecast the time-evolution of experimentally measured cylinder wakes in the subcritical vortex shedding regime. Using a dataset of two-dimensional, two-component particle image velocimetry measurements, we train fully convolutional neural networks, U-Nets, Fourier neural operators, and dynamic mode decomposition-based models to forecast the development of experimentally measured velocity fields. To characterize data-driven approaches contending with transient flow features and limited, imperfect observations, the development of predictions over extended forecast horizons is examined at a fixed Reynolds number (Re = 590). Next, models are trained at a range of Reynolds numbers (Re = 230 to Re = 2920) to investigate the impact of increasingly turbulent and three-dimensional flow phenomena, and the challenges associated with measuring them, on forecast quality. We find that experimentally trained surrogate models can provide meaningful predictions over short time horizons, propagate low-frequency dynamics over longer forecast periods, and achieve faster-than-real-time evaluation. However, the data-driven models struggle to preserve transient flow features and high-frequency energy content when faced with noisy measurements and incomplete state observations. This emphasizes the underlying challenges that remain for data-driven modeling approaches to effectively contend with fluid dynamics in real-world engineering applications, where observations are often imperfect and limited.
Submitted
9 June 20262 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.10848
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.