AG-2026.06-966·physics.geo-ph·cross-listed: astro-ph.EPhep-exhep-ph
Towards imaging Earth's large-scale structures by directional geoneutrino detection with Ocean Bottom Detector
Authors
- Zhihao Xu
- Takumi Araki
- Simran Chauhan
- Brian C. Crow
- Max A. A. Dornfest
- Stephen T. Dye
- John Graham
- Misaki Hosoya
- Kunio Inoue
- John G. Learned
- Viacheslav A. Li
- William F. McDonough
- Takeru Ohno
- Takanobu Ono
- Taichi Sakai
- Jackson Seligman
- Nathan Sibert
- David Vartanyan
- Hiroko Watanabe
- Jeffrey Yepez
Abstract
Geoneutrinos, electron antineutrinos produced by radioactive decays of heat-producing elements (HPEs) within the Earth, provide unique insights into Earth's interior and heat budget since their first detection in 2005 by KamLAND. Conventional geoneutrino detectors currently provide integrated global information and lack the capability to spatially resolve structures deep within the Earth. Here, we evaluate the ability of angular-sensitive geoneutrino detectors to distinguish between homogeneous and heterogeneous mantle models, focusing on Large Low Shear Velocity Provinces (LLSVPs). Our results show that LLSVPs enriched in Th and U yield a distinct flux of geoneutrinos with distinctive angular patterns. An oceanic site above the Pacific LLSVP is considered a particularly favorable detector location. The Ocean Bottom Detector (OBD) project aims to leverage this spatial resolving advantage by deploying a kiloton-scale liquid scintillator detector directly on the ocean floor, enabling unprecedented sensitivity for mantle geoneutrino detection. These findings demonstrate the critical role of combining geophysical and geochemical data to guide detector site selection, ultimately improving constraints on Earth's internal heat and the HPE distribution.
Submitted
11 June 2026yesterday
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2606.13273
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.