AG-2026.10-1122·math-ph·cross-listed: gr-qchep-phhep-thmath.AG
Wave packets asymptotics in $κ$-minkowski space
Authors
- Adith A
- A. Bhagwat
Abstract
In this paper, we study the nature of wave packets and their decay behavior in the $κ$-Minkowski space. We employ techniques from singularity theory throughout our analysis. Specifically, we use methods from the theory of Lagrangian singularities and caustics to study the topology of the energy-level manifold. The Newton polyhedron method from the theory of oscillatory integrals is applied to analyze the decay behavior of wave packets. We find that for a generic Hamiltonian in the $κ$-Minkowski space, the associated wave packets exhibit different decay rates depending on the control parameter of the system. When the control parameter takes values on the cusp, the system exhibits decay of order $t^{-1/4}$; otherwise, it exhibits decay of order $t^{-1/2}$. This distinctive behavior of wave packets in the $κ$-Minkowski makes it fundamentally different from commutative spacetime.
Submitted
8 October 20261 week ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2610.12331
Summary
Wave packets in κ-Minkowski space (a quantum-gravity-motivated spacetime) decay at rates that depend on a control parameter: t^(-1/4) near special 'cusp' values, otherwise t^(-1/2), unlike ordinary spacetime.
- κ-Minkowski space, motivated by quantum gravity, produces wave packet decay rates not seen in commutative spacetime, showing genuine physical differences from classical relativity.
- The decay rate switches sharply between t^(-1/4) and t^(-1/2) depending on where a control parameter sits, revealing hidden geometric structure called cusps in the energy manifold.
- The analysis uses singularity theory and caustics—tools from geometrical optics and critical-point theory—to trace how oscillatory waves behave on noncommutative backgrounds.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.