AG-2026.10-1167·hep-th
Stringy resolution of bouncing singularities
Authors
- Ilija Burić
- Ivan Gusev
- Andrei Parnachev
Abstract
We study the near-horizon geometry of near-extremal NS5 branes, which admits an exact worldsheet description in terms of the $SL(2,\mathbb{R})_k/U(1)$ coset. In the supergravity limit, the analytically continued time-domain reflection amplitude exhibits a singularity associated with a null geodesic bouncing off the black-hole singularity, analogous to the bouncing singularities of boundary correlators in asymptotically AdS spacetimes. We show that finite-string-length effects render this amplitude an entire function of complex time, completely resolving the bouncing singularity. This resolution is nonperturbative in the inverse coset level: the singularity persists at every finite order in the expansion.
Submitted
8 October 20261 week ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2610.12311
Summary
String theory effects resolve mathematical singularities that appear when wave-like excitations bounce off black-hole centers in five-dimensional branes, fixing a problem that classical gravity alone cannot solve.
- Near-extremal NS5 branes have a quantum description in string theory that lets physicists compute what happens when waves reflect off black-hole singularities exactly, without relying on approximations.
- Classical gravity predicts that reflected waves develop infinities (singularities) in their amplitudes, but accounting for the finite size of strings smooths these out completely—a nonperturbative effect invisible in standard perturbative expansions.
- This demonstrates a concrete mechanism by which string theory can resolve singularities that plague classical gravity, offering insights into how quantum gravity might handle black-hole interiors.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.