AG-2026.10-1168·hep-ph·cross-listed: cs.AIhep-lathep-thnucl-th
Machine Learning Meets High-Energy Nuclear Physics: From Pattern Recognition to Physics-Integrated Discovery
Authors
- Xun Chen
- Weiyao Ke
- Yu-Gang Ma
- Long-Gang Pang
- Kai Zhou
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) in high-energy nuclear physics (HENP) is entering a new stage in which physical knowledge is incorporated more directly into data analysis, simulation, and physics inference. This mini-review focuses on developments that have matured in the past several years. Whereas earlier applications emphasized event classification, pattern recognition, and surrogate models for selected observables, recent work has moved toward physics-integrated workflows: calibrated Bayesian extraction of QCD matter properties, dense-matter equation-of-state inference from heavy-ion and neutron-star data, generative event modeling, neural unfolding of weak physical signals, differentiable inverse solvers, gauge-equivariant and diffusion-based lattice-field samplers, and neural reconstruction of model functions in holographic QCD. We survey recent applications of ML in heavy-ion collisions, neutron-star physics, lattice QFT, and holographic or continuum QCD. The emphasis is not on ML architectures alone, but on how they enter concrete physics workflows, how physical constraints such as symmetries, conservation laws, causality, thermodynamic stability, and topology are imposed, and how uncertainty quantification and validation determine whether an AI-assisted result can support a reliable physics conclusion.
Submitted
8 October 20261 week ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2610.12293
Summary
Machine learning in nuclear physics is evolving from simple pattern-matching to physics-aware systems that respect symmetries and conservation laws, enabling better inference of matter properties from collider and neutron-star data.
- ML models now embed physical constraints like symmetry and energy conservation directly into their design, rather than treating physics as a post-hoc filter on AI results.
- These hybrid approaches extract properties of exotic matter (like the quark-gluon plasma) with quantified uncertainty, making AI outputs scientifically trustworthy enough for publication.
- The shift from 'Does ML classify events well?' to 'Can ML solve inverse physics problems while respecting causality and thermodynamics?' opens new avenues for accelerating discovery in frontier experiments.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.