AG-2024.01-042·gr-qc
Observations of Orbiting Hot Spots around Scalarized Reissner-Nordström Black Holes
Authors
- Yiqian Chen
- Peng Wang
- Haitang Yang
Abstract
This paper investigates the observational signatures of hot spots orbiting scalarized Reissner-Nordström black holes, which have been reported to possess multiple photon spheres. In contrast to the single-photon sphere case, hot spots orbiting black holes with two photon spheres produce additional image tracks in time integrated images capturing a complete orbit of hot spots. Notably, these newly observed patterns manifest as a distinct second-highest peak in temporal magnitudes when observed at low inclination angles. These findings offer promising observational probes for distinguishing black holes with multiple photon spheres from their single-photon sphere counterparts.
Submitted
4 January 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2401.10905
Summary
Hot spots orbiting scalarized Reissner-Nordström black holes with multiple photon spheres generate additional image tracks and a distinct secondary peak in temporal magnitude at low inclination angles, providing an observational signature to distinguish them from single-photon sphere black holes.
- Scalarized RN black holes admit multiple photon spheres, whose multiplicity produces additional competing image trajectories in time-integrated observations—a qualitative departure from the Kerr or standard RN case.
- Low-inclination observations exhibit a characteristic second-highest magnitude peak in temporal profiles as hot spots complete their orbit, arising from interference of images at different photon radii.
- These temporal and morphological signatures are proposed as an observational discriminant for scalar-tensor theories and non-GR black hole hair, testable in principle with high-resolution interferometric observations (e.g., EHT-scale data).
specialist · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.