AG-2024.02-1346·quant-ph
Comparative study of quantum error correction strategies for the heavy-hexagonal lattice
Authors
- César Benito
- Esperanza López
- Borja Peropadre
- Alejandro Bermudez
Abstract
Topological quantum error correction is a milestone in the scaling roadmap of quantum computers, which targets circuits with trillions of gates that would allow running quantum algorithms for real-world problems. The square-lattice surface code has become the workhorse to address this challenge, as it poses milder requirements on current devices both in terms of required error rates and small local connectivities. In some platforms, however, the connectivities are kept even lower in order to minimise gate errors at the hardware level, which limits the error correcting codes that can be directly implemented on them. In this work, we make a comparative study of possible strategies to overcome this limitation for the heavy-hexagonal lattice, the architecture of current IBM superconducting quantum computers. We explore two complementary strategies: the search for an efficient embedding of the surface code into the heavy-hexagonal lattice, as well as the use of codes whose connectivity requirements are naturally tailored to this architecture, such as subsystem-type and Floquet codes. Using noise models of increased complexity, we assess the performance of these strategies for IBM devices in terms of their error thresholds and qubit footprints. An optimized SWAP-based embedding of the surface code is found to be the most promising strategy towards a near-term demonstration of quantum error correction advantage.
Submitted
3 February 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2402.02185
Summary
Researchers compared different quantum error correction strategies for IBM's heavy-hexagonal qubit layout, finding that adapting the standard surface code via optimized qubit-swap operations outperforms alternatives tailored to that architecture.
- IBM's qubit connectivity is too constrained for direct use of the standard surface code, so researchers tested three workarounds: embedding the surface code indirectly, using codes naturally matched to the geometry, and hybrid approaches.
- The optimized surface-code embedding (using SWAP gates to reroute information flow) achieved better error thresholds and used fewer qubits than codes designed specifically for the heavy-hexagonal lattice, making it more practical near-term.
- This work clarifies which error-correction strategy IBM and similar platforms should pursue first, steering quantum-computer scaling toward the trillion-gate circuits needed for real-world applications.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.