AG-2024.02-1495·quant-ph
Efficient, High-Fidelity Single-Photon Switch Based on Waveguide-Coupled Cavities
Authors
- Mateusz Duda
- Luke Brunswick
- Luke R. Wilson
- Pieter Kok
Abstract
We demonstrate theoretically that waveguide-coupled cavities with embedded two-level emitters can act as a highly efficient, high-fidelity single-photon switch. The photon switch is an optical router triggered by a classical signal -- the propagation direction of single input photons in the waveguide is controlled by changing the emitter-cavity coupling parameters in situ, for example using applied fields. The switch reflects photons in the weak emitter-cavity coupling regime and transmits photons in the strong coupling regime. By calculating transmission and reflection spectra using the input-output formalism of quantum optics and the transfer matrix approach, we obtain the fidelity and efficiency of the switch with a single-photon input in both regimes. We find that a single waveguide-coupled cavity can route input photon wave packets with near-unity efficiency and fidelity if the wave packet width is smaller than the cavity mode linewidth. We also find that using multiple waveguide-coupled cavities increases the switching bandwidth, allowing wider wave packets to be routed with high efficiency and fidelity. For example, an array of three waveguide-coupled cavities can reflect an input Gaussian wave packet with a full width at half-maximum of 1 nm (corresponding to a few-picosecond pulse) with an efficiency E_r = 96.4% and a fidelity F_r = 97.7%, or transmit the wave packet with an efficiency E_t = 99.7% and a fidelity F_t = 99.8%. Such efficient, high-fidelity single-photon routing is essential for scalable photonic quantum technologies.
Submitted
8 February 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2402.05714
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.