AG-2024.03-1285·hep-ph·cross-listed: astro-ph.HE
A closer scrutiny of cosmic ray proton energy losses
Authors
- AmirFarzan Esmaeili
- Arman Esmaili
- Pasquale Dario Serpico
Abstract
The percent-level precision attained by modern cosmic ray (CR) observations motivates reaching a comparable or better control of theoretical uncertainties. Here we focus on energy-loss processes affecting low-energy CR protons ($\sim 0.1-5$ GeV), where the experimental errors are small and collisional effects play a comparatively larger role with respect to collisionless transport ones. We study three aspects of the problem: i) We quantitatively assess the role of the nuclear elastic cross-section, for the first time, providing analytical formulae for the stopping power and inelasticity. ii) We discuss the error arising from treating both elastic and pion production inelastic interactions as continuous energy loss processes, as opposed to catastrophic ones. The former is the approximation used in virtually all modern numerical calculations. iii) We consider sub-leading effects such as relativistic corrections, radiative and medium processes in ionization energy-losses. Our analysis reveals that neglecting i) leads to errors close to 1%, notably around and below 1 GeV; neglecting ii) leads to errors reaching about 3% within the considered energy range; iii) contributes to a minor effect, gauged at the level of 0.1%. Consequently, while iii) can currently be neglected, ii) warrants consideration, and we also recommend incorporating i) into computations. We conclude with some perspectives on further steps to be taken towards a high-precision goal of theoretical CR predictions regarding the treatment of energy-losses.
Submitted
26 March 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2403.18012
Summary
High-precision cosmic ray observations now demand equally precise theoretical predictions. This work identifies three sources of error in how we calculate energy losses for low-energy protons, showing that two of them—neglecting nuclear elastic scattering and treating interactions as continuous rather than sudden—introduce 1–3% errors that should no longer be ignored.
- Nuclear elastic scattering, routinely omitted from cosmic ray calculations, causes ~1% errors around 1 GeV—significant when experimental precision is now sub-percent.
- The standard approximation of treating violent collisions (like pion creation) as smooth, continuous energy drain introduces ~3% errors; switching to the correct 'catastrophic' model matters for precision.
- Relativistic and radiative corrections remain negligible (0.1%), so focusing computational effort on the first two corrections offers the best return for reaching percent-level theoretical accuracy.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.