AG-2024.04-040·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.COhep-phhep-th
Solution to the cosmological constant problem
Authors
- David L. Wiltshire
Abstract
I propose an observationally and theoretically consistent resolution of the cosmological constant problem: $Λ$ is a counterterm -- with a running coupling -- that balances the monopole celestial sky average of the kinetic energy of expansion of inhomogeneously distributed `small' cosmic voids. No other dark energy source is required. This solution relies on the first investigation of void statistics in cosmological simulations in full general relativity (arXiv:2403.15134). Results are consistent with parameters of the Timescape model of cosmological backreaction. Crucially, dynamical spatial curvature arises as time-varying spatial gradients of the kinetic spatial curvature, and depends directly on the void volume fraction. Its monopole average generates the cosmological term. This result potentially resolves the Hubble tension and offers new approaches to tackling other tensions and anomalies.
Submitted
2 April 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2404.02129
Summary
The cosmological constant isn't mysterious dark energy but rather a quantum correction that balances the kinetic energy of cosmic voids, with its strength evolving over time like other quantum couplings.
- Instead of invoking unknown dark energy, the author proposes the cosmological constant is a counterterm—a correction that naturally appears in quantum field theory—adjusted by the universe's void distribution.
- Using relativistic simulations of void statistics, the work shows that spatial curvature changes as voids evolve, and its average effect reproduces the observed cosmological constant without additional physics.
- If correct, this removes the 120-order-of-magnitude mismatch between quantum predictions and observations that has haunted cosmology for decades, and may explain tensions in measuring the universe's expansion rate.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.