AG-2024.04-492·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.HEhep-th
Avoiding singularities in Lorentzian-Euclidean black holes: the role of atemporality
Authors
- Salvatore Capozziello
- Silvia De Bianchi
- Emmanuele Battista
Abstract
We investigate a Schwarzschild metric exhibiting a signature change across the event horizon, which gives rise to what we term a Lorentzian-Euclidean black hole. The resulting geometry is regularized by employing the Hadamard partie finie technique, which allows us to prove that the metric represents a solution of vacuum Einstein equations. In this framework, we introduce the concept of atemporality as the dynamical mechanism responsible for the transition from a regime with a real-valued time variable to a new one featuring an imaginary time. We show that this mechanism prevents the occurrence of the singularity and, by means of the regularized Kretschmann invariant, we discuss in which terms atemporality can be considered as the characteristic feature of this black hole.
Submitted
26 April 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2404.17267
Summary
Physicists propose a modified black hole where time switches from real to imaginary across the event horizon, using advanced mathematical techniques to show this avoids the singularity that normally lurks at the center.
- The authors construct a black hole where spacetime literally changes character at the event horizon—from Lorentzian (normal space-time) to Euclidean (imaginary time)—solving the Einstein equations in this hybrid geometry.
- A mathematical tool called the Hadamard partie finie technique allows them to regularize infinities that would normally appear, making the solution physically sensible.
- The key insight is 'atemporality': when time becomes imaginary, the usual curvature singularity disappears, suggesting exotic matter states near black hole centers may avoid catastrophic infinities.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.