AG-2024.05-173·gr-qc
Wormhole restrictions from quantum energy inequalities
Authors
- Eleni-Alexandra Kontou
Abstract
Wormhole solutions, bridges that connect different parts of spacetime, were proposed early in the history of General Relativity. Soon after, it was shown that all wormholes violate classical energy conditions, which are non-negativity constraints on contractions of the stress-energy tensor. Since these conditions are violated by quantum fields, it was believed that wormholes can be constructed in the context of semiclassical gravity. But negative energies in quantum field theory are not without restriction: quantum energy inequalities (QEIs) control renormalized negative energies averaged over a geodesic. Thus, QEIs provide restrictions on the construction of wormholes. This work is a review of the relevant literature, thus focusing on results where QEIs restrict traversable wormholes. Both 'short' and 'long' (without causality violations) wormhole solutions in the context of semiclassical gravity are examined. A new result is presented on constraints on the Maldacena, Milekhin, and Popov 'long' wormhole from the recently derived doubled smeared null energy condition.
Submitted
9 May 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2405.05963
Summary
Quantum energy inequalities—limits on how negative energy can be in quantum fields—impose new restrictions on whether wormholes could actually exist, even in theories where quantum effects are included.
- Wormholes require negative energy to stay open, but quantum field theory allows only limited amounts of it in specific spatial patterns.
- This review shows that quantum energy inequalities rule out many previously proposed wormhole designs, including some that were thought viable in semiclassical gravity.
- A new constraint derived here tightens restrictions on a specific recent wormhole proposal, suggesting the bar for building traversable wormholes is higher than previously thought.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.