AG-2024.05-181·gr-qc
Improved frequency spectra of gravitational waves with memory in a binary-black-hole simulation
Authors
- Yitian Chen
- Michael Boyle
- Nils Deppe
- Lawrence E. Kidder
- Keefe Mitman
- Jordan Moxon
- Kyle C. Nelli
- Harald P. Pfeiffer
- Mark A. Scheel
- William Throwe
- Nils L. Vu
- Saul A. Teukolsky
Abstract
Numerical relativists can now produce gravitational waveforms with memory effects routinely and accurately. The gravitational-wave memory effect contains very low-frequency components, including a persistent offset. The presence of these components violates basic assumptions about time-shift behavior underpinning standard data-analysis techniques in gravitational-wave astronomy. This poses a challenge to the analysis of waveform spectra: How to preserve the low-frequency characteristics when transforming a time-domain waveform to the frequency domain. To tackle this challenge, we revisit the preprocessing procedures applied to the waveforms that contain memory effects. We find inconsistency between the zero-frequency limit of displacement memory and the low- frequency spectrum of the same memory preprocessed using the common scheme in literature. To resolve the inconsistency, we propose a new robust preprocessing scheme that produces the spectra of memory waveforms more faithfully. Using this new scheme, we inspect several characteristics of the spectrum of a memory waveform. In particular, we find a discernible beating pattern formed by the dominant oscillatory mode and the displacement memory. This pattern is absent in the spectrum of a waveform without memory. The difference between the memory and no-memory waveforms is too small to be observed by current-generation detectors in a single binary-black-hole event. Detecting the memory in a single event is likely to occur in the era of next-generation detectors.
Submitted
10 May 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2405.06197
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.