AG-2024.05-325·astro-ph.HE·cross-listed: gr-qc
General relativistic magnetohydrodynamics simulations for binary neutron star mergers
Authors
- Kenta Kiuchi
Abstract
Binary neutron star mergers used to be the most promising candidate for gravitational waves for ground-based gravitational wave detectors, such as advanced LIGO and advanced VIRGO. This was proved by the detection of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star merger in 2017. Numerical modeling is pivotal in predicting and interpreting binary neutron star mergers. This chapter reviews the progress of fully general relativistic magnetized binary neutron star merger simulations. From 2008 to 2024, about forty numerical relativity simulations of magnetized binary neutron star mergers were conducted with a different level of sophistication. This chapter aims to comprehensively view the magnetohydrodynamics effect in binary neutron star mergers by reviewing all the related works.
Submitted
16 May 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2405.10081
Summary
A comprehensive review of how physicists simulate the violent mergers of two neutron stars while accounting for magnetic fields and Einstein's theory of gravity, covering 16 years of increasingly sophisticated computational efforts.
- Simulating neutron star mergers requires solving three physics problems simultaneously—gravity waves, fluid dynamics, and magnetism—which demands enormous computational power but is essential for interpreting real detections.
- Magnetic fields in these mergers can dramatically affect how matter behaves and what radiation gets released, so ignoring them leads to incomplete predictions of observable signals.
- This review synthesizes ~40 different simulation studies to show how our models have grown more realistic, helping us extract physics insights from events like the gravitational wave signal detected in 2017.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.