AG-2024.06-070·gr-qc
A Note on and Generalization of "Exploring Modified Kaniadakis Entropy: MOND Theory and the Bekenstein Bound Conjecture"
Authors
- Julius Lehmann
Abstract
In a recent paper by Ambrósio et al. [arXiv:2405.14799], it was shown that the gravitational force law of the Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) phenomenology can be derived within the framework of entropic gravity and the holographic principle by assuming an entropy function other than the conventional Boltzmann-Gibbs entropy. In particular, they derived the standard interpolation function of MOND together with an analytical expression for the acceleration constant $a_0$ by utilizing Kaniadakis' modified entropy. In this short note, using the same methodology, we generalize this result and show that MONDian behavior is a rather general consequence of combining entropic gravity with non-Boltzmann-Gibbs entropies, which depends on only a few conditions imposed on the generalized entropy function.
Submitted
4 June 20241 year ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2406.02367
Summary
The paper shows that MOND—an alternative theory of gravity for galaxies—isn't unique to one specific entropy formula, but emerges naturally from a whole family of non-standard entropy functions combined with entropic gravity.
- Previous work derived MOND from Kaniadakis entropy; this paper proves MOND-like behavior emerges from any entropy function meeting minimal conditions, making the result more fundamental.
- The work strengthens the entropic gravity approach by showing MONDian dynamics aren't a lucky accident tied to one formula, but a robust consequence of the framework's structure.
- This generalization suggests MOND's success in explaining galaxy rotation curves may reflect deep principles about information and gravity rather than ad-hoc phenomenology.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.