AG-2024.06-1757·cond-mat.mes-hall·cross-listed: quant-ph
High-fidelity single-spin shuttling in silicon
Authors
- Maxim De Smet
- Yuta Matsumoto
- Anne-Marije J. Zwerver
- Larysa Tryputen
- Sander L. de Snoo
- Sergey V. Amitonov
- S. R. Katiraee-Far
- Amir Sammak
- Nodar Samkharadze
- Önder Gül
- Rick N. M. Wasserman
- E. Greplová
- Maximilian Rimbach-Russ
- Giordano Scappucci
- Lieven M. K. Vandersypen
Abstract
The computational power and fault-tolerance of future large-scale quantum processors derive in large part from the connectivity between the qubits. One approach to increase connectivity is to engineer qubit-qubit interactions at a distance. Alternatively, the connectivity can be increased by physically displacing the qubits. This has been explored in trapped-ion experiments and using neutral atoms trapped with optical tweezers. For semiconductor spin qubits, several studies have investigated spin coherent shuttling of individual electrons, but high-fidelity transport over extended distances remains to be demonstrated. Here we report shuttling of an electron inside an isotopically purified Si/SiGe heterostructure using electric gate potentials. First, we form static quantum dots, and study how spin coherence decays as we repeatedly move a single electron between up to five dots. Next, we create a traveling wave potential to transport an electron in a moving quantum dot. This second method shows substantially better spin coherence than the first. It allows us to displace an electron over an effective distance of 10 $μ$m in under 200 ns with an average fidelity of 99.5%. These results will guide future efforts to realize large-scale semiconductor quantum processors, making use of electron shuttling both within and between qubit arrays.
Submitted
11 June 20242 years ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2406.07267
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.